Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Mutual Savings Institution

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1983No. 13549PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWERS, Justice.

Hartwin R. Peterson, Sr. and his wife, Clara I. Peterson, appeal from a judgment of the trial court, based upon its directed verdict, that they take nothing in their suit against appellee, Mutual Savings Institution, entered at the close of the Petersons’ ease in chief. We will affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The Petersons sued Mutual on a theory that there existed between them a “fiduciary relationship” which gave rise to a duty on Mutual’s part to ascertain by periodic inspections whether the construction of a residence on the Petersons’ lot complied with the plans…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Colonial Savings Ass'n v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eckman v. Centennial Savings Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. Hernandez v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
  3. Charles E. Beard, Inc., D/B/A Security Microfilm Co. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Coastal Corp. v. Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Northwest Bank v. Garrison, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API