Legal Opinion

Colonial Savings Ass'n v. Taylor

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1976No. B-5883PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUGHTY, Justice.

This controversy arose because a house owned by respondent, Mr. Taylor, which was destroyed by fire, was not insured. Mr. Taylor sued petitioner, Colonial Savings Association, contending that Colonial had gratuitously assumed responsibility for insuring the house and had negligently failed to do so. Trial was to a jury, which returned a verdict with answers favorable to Mr. Taylor, but the trial court entered judgment non obstante veredicto for Colonial. The court of civil appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and entered judgment for Taylor for $4,300.00.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Hall v. HardTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Boyle General Tire Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Siegel v. . Spear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Fort Bend County Drainage District v. SbruschTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Deleese Allen v. Walmart Stores, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API