Legal Opinion

Eckman v. Centennial Savings Bank

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 13, 1988No. 05-87-00896-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLUNG, Justice.

Carl Eckman, James Nicholson and Gary Hutchison appeal a summary judgment in favor of Centennial Savings Bank, appellee. The judgment ordered that Eckman, Nicholson and Hutchison take nothing on their claims and that Centennial recover the deficiency due under promissory notes executed by Eckman, Nicholson, Hutchison and Jackson. Eckman, Nicholson and Hutchison complain that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because (1) Centennial failed to show there were no genuine issues of material fact as to their claims against Centennial (2) the affidavits, depositions…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. Nortex Oil & Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hernandez v. HeldenfelsTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Manges v. Astra Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Levinthal v. Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Esparza v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Halton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Phippen v. Deere and Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  5. Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API