Legal Opinion
San Diego Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1988No. D006719PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
San Diego Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (San Diego SAFE) and Comarco Inc. (Comarco) seek a writ of *1468mandate and/or prohibition after Cubic Inc. (Cubic) obtained a preliminary injunction and writ of mandate restraining implementation of a contract between San Diego SAFE and Comarco and requiring San Diego SAFE to engage in competitive bidding. At the direction of the Supreme Court we issued an alternative writ. We discharge the alternative writ and grant the petition.
Factual and Procedural Background
Section 2550 of the Streets and Highway Code1 provides…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- County of Riverside v. WhitlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- R & a Vending Services, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Smith v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lubner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Grubb & Ellis Co. v. BelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Woodland Joint Unified School District v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Great West Contractors, Inc. v. Irvine Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Construction Industry Force Account Council v. Amador Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.