Legal Opinion
Construction Industry Force Account Council v. Amador Water Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1999No. C028540PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs 1 brought this action to challenge the statutory authority of defendant Amador Water Agency (Agency) to complete a project valued in excess of $130,000 by using its own personnel rather than by advertising for bids from outside contractors. Because this case turns on statutory interpretation, the parties submitted the matter to the superior court on stipulated facts. The superior court entered judgment in favor of the Agency. After independent review of the pertinent statutes (Col-Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Auburn Union School Dist. (1993) 21…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- California School Employees Ass'n. v. Governing Board of the Marine Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Cal-Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Auburn Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Leffel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Prime Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Valley Health System (In Re Valley Health System)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2010
- KAUFMAN & BROAD v. Performance PlasteringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.