Legal Opinion
Grubb & Ellis Co. v. Bello
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 5, 1993No. B063118PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAPPE, J. *
Introduction
Michael Bello and M.B. Contractors, Inc. (Bello) appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294) 1 in favor of Grubb & Ellis Company (Grubb). We affirm.
Facts
Bello entered into exclusive listing agreements with Grubb, a real estate broker, to sell real property located at 1041 and 1047 West Gladstone in San Dimas, California. Identical provisions in both listing agreements provided for arbitration of “[a]ny dispute or claim in law or equity arising out of this contract or any resulting transaction.” Each agreement contained the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kinney v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe and Takeout III, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Westra v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sy First Family Ltd. Partnership v. CheungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.