Legal Opinion

Lubner v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1996No. B087436PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

In a factual scenario that seems to have been taken from a law school hypothetical, two artists lost much of their life work after a city trash truck parked at the top of a hill rolled down and crashed into their home, damaging the house, two cars and their artwork, which included paintings, drawings, prints and posters. We are asked to permit the artists, Martin and Lorraine Lubner, to recover damages based on either loss of reputation or emotional distress. Even though we sympathize with appellants, established law does not permit us to recognize the type of damages they seek.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API