Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Hatch

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1985No. A023746PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold it is an abuse of discretion for trial courts to deny motions for pendente lite attorney fees and costs in marital dissolution proceedings without considering the needs of the requesting spouse and the ability to pay of the spouse against whom the award is sought. California’s public policy in favor of expeditious and final resolution of marital dissolution actions is best accomplished by providing at the outset of litigation, consistent with the financial circumstances of the parties, a parity between spouses in their ability to obtain effective legal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of JafemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. In Re Marriage of PopenhagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of BrantnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Marriage of KeechCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. In Re the Marriage of NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. In Re Marriage of O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API