Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Norton

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1988No. B029143PublishedCited by 12 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

*

Facts and Proceedings Below

Appellant, Rachelle Norton, and respondent, Peter Norton, have been involved in lengthy and complicated marriage dissolution proceedings. Ms. Norton has brought Mr. Norton to court several times. The present proceeding involves the custody of the parties’ 2 minor children, Mark and Jason, who were 11 and 10 at the time of the trial court proceedings. Mark has had severe asthma since birth. He must take medication and use sophisticated apparatus to control his condition. Ms. Norton had custody of the two boys until Mr. Norton gained physical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. In Re Marriage of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Covenant Mutual Insurance v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Meagher v. MeagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. FLIR Systems, Inc. v. ParrishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Garcia v. SantanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Lossing v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. In Re the Marriage of BerlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API