Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Keech

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1999No. B114366PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZEBROWSKI, J.

In a dissolution action between appellant Richard C. Keech (husband) and Kristan Keech (wife), husband appeals from an order that determined, pendente lite, the amount of monthly spousal support and child support for which husband would be responsible, and the amount of wife’s attorney and accountant’s fees and costs husband was required to pay.

Husband’s primary contention on appeal is that the court abused its discretion in ordering husband to pay $3,200 of wife’s accountant’s fees at the rate of $1,000 per month for the first three months, and $25,000 of wife’s attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Marriage of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of CuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. In Re Marriage of FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. In Re Marriage of DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Sharples v. SharplesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API