In Re Marriage of O'Connor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MASTERSON, J.
With over $3 million in attorney’s fees and costs already incurred in this acrimonious dissolution matter, husband has $2 million in assets remaining and wife has at least $40 million. Husband was awarded $250,000 in pendente lite attorney’s fees and costs early in the proceedings and was later awarded an additional $450,000 pendente lite. Wife asks this court to set the latter award aside, contending that since husband had the $450,000 available from his own assets, he failed to make a threshold showing of need for the award. We reject wife’s definition of “need,” finding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Marriage of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Marriage of HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Marriage of DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Sorge v. SorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Marriage of Cappello CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.