Legal Opinion

In Re Carter

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1938No. 6546PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Disciplinary charges were filed against D. L. Carter, a member of this bar. The commission, after a prosecution before it by a special prosecuting committee, found petitioner guilty of a violation of his duties as an attorney, and recommended a suspension of one year and assessment of $340.20 costs of the proceedings against petitioner (secs. 3-408, 3-412, I. C. A.) who filed a petition for review thereof.

The charge involves two separate situations: First, for some years prior to July 6, 1933, Mrs. Lelia H. Thompson, then Buchanan, had been petitioner’s intermittent client and he had, both as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re the Disbarment of BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In re KerlIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Re BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re BarclayUtah Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of LutzIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Idaho State Bar v. WarrickIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Matter of TwayIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Idaho State Bar v. MeservyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Idaho State Bar v. DawIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API