Legal Opinion

Idaho State Bar v. Meservy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1959No. 8618PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*506TAYLOR, Justice.

This proceeding was commenced in this court by complaint charging that defendant had unlawfully engaged in the practice of law and that defendant had held himself out, and does now hold himself out, as qualified to practice law, all without right or authority so to do.

Defendant’s objections to the complaint, raised by motion and demurrer, were determined by this court in Idaho State Bar v. Meservy, 79 Idaho 526, 325 P.2d 688. Thereafter, defendant filed his answer and this court entered its order of reference as follows:

“The above entitled matter being at issue on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Paul v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. SchaferIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. RingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. In Re BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Washington Ass'n of RealtorsWashington Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. Idaho Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re FarnessUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2000
  3. State v. BettwieserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Idaho State Bar v. VillegasIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Beck v. Elmore CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API