Legal Opinion

In Re Barclay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1933No. 5324PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1931 our State Legislature enacted a law creating the Utah State Bar (Laws of Utah 1931, c. 48, p. 165). Pursuant to that act, a complaint was filed with the bar commission charging that:

“L. J. Barclay, a member of the said Utah State Bar, has knowingly and willfully violated Subdivision 2 of Section 831 of Compiled Laws of Utah 1917, which reads as follows:
“ ‘2. Willful disobedience or violation of an order of the court requiring him to do or forbear an act connected with or in the course of his profession and any violation of the oath taken by him or of his duties as such attorney and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In re PlatzUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. In re Disbarment of Evans & Rogers ex rel. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. In Re BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In re HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Rodríguez TorresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
  2. Ruckenbrod v. MullinsUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Matter of MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Barnard v. WassermannUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action of McCuneUtah Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API