Legal Opinion

In Re the Disbarment of Bailey

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1926No. Civil No. 2523PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an original proceeding in the Supreme Court for the disbarment of Weldon J. Bailey, an attorney of this court. A petition was filed by the Attorney General charging Bailey, hereinafter called respondent, with wrongful, unlawful, unprofessional and unethical conduct and acts unbecoming an attorney. Such alleged misconduct was detailed in an affidavit attached to the petition, which is substantially as follows:

George F. Bowland died in the Government Hospital at Tucson, Arizona, leaving an estate consisting only of a claim against the government. Decedent’s heirs were his mother, two…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bar Ass'n v. GreenhoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. West Virginia State Bar v. EarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API