In re Kerl
Idaho Supreme Court
Proceeding for disbarment of Thomas T. Kerl. The conviction of a felony or misdemeanor involving -moral turpitude in the federal court or the courts of a sister state is ground for disbarment in Idaho. (In re Davies, 93 Pa. 116, 39 Am. Rep. 729; In re Graffius, 241 Pa. 222, 88 Atl. 429 ; State ex rel. Hardin v. Grover, 47 Wash. 39, 91 Pac. 564; In re Innes, 176 App. Div. 902, 162 N. Y. Supp. 721; Selling v. Bad-ford, 243 U. S. 46, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 569, 37 Sup.
Read the full summary
Proceeding for disbarment of Thomas T. Kerl. The conviction of a felony or misdemeanor involving -moral turpitude in the federal court or the courts of a sister state is ground for disbarment in Idaho. (In re Davies, 93 Pa. 116, 39 Am. Rep. 729; In re Graffius, 241 Pa. 222, 88 Atl. 429 ; State ex rel. Hardin v. Grover, 47 Wash. 39, 91 Pac. 564; In re Innes, 176 App. Div. 902, 162 N. Y. Supp. 721; Selling v. Bad-ford, 243 U. S. 46, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 569, 37 Sup. Ct. 377, 61 L. ed. 585; Bornes v. District Court of Appeal, 178 Cal. 500,173 Pac. 1100.) Conviction under like circumstances is ground…
1Opinion of the Court
MOEGAN, C. j.
Thomas T. Kerl, an attorney at law admitted to practice in the courts of Idaho, was, on December 12, 1918, in the district court of the United States, in and for the Omaha division of the district of Nebraska, convicted of violating the portions of U. S. Statutes at Large, vol. 40, chapter 75, page 553, which are as follows: “Whoever, when the United States is at war, shall wilfully make or convey false reports or false statements with the intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States, or to promote the success of its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- In the Matter of EbbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Matter of Application of ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Ex parte BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Otsuka v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Braverman v. Bar Assn. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. LangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re NeedhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.