Legal Opinion
Holton v. Lankford
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 16, 1939No. 12827PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
Mrs. Eilza T. Holton filed an application for registration of title to land. Mrs. Mattie L. Lankford filed de fenses, and a cross-petition praying for registration of the land in her own name. Other persons intervened on both sides. For convenience, Mrs. Holton together with those who intervened on her side may sometimes be referred to herein merely as the plaintiff. Mrs. Lankford and the intervening defendants may in like manner be designated in the singular, as the defendant. The examiner made a report containing findings of law and of fact in favor of the plaintiff. The…
2Cases cited135 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hodges v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tyler v. Judges of Court of RegistrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Kearney v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Ivey v. IveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Henderson v. County Board of Registration & ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Cincinnati Insurance v. MacLeodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.