Avery v. Solargizer International, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants (plaintiffs) Michael Avery, Dino Thiessen and Glen Darrow, II, commenced an action against respondents (defendants), alleging, inter alia, violation of Minnesota’s Franchise Act; fraud; breach of fiduciary duty; deceptive trade practices; false advertising; and breach of Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code warranties. Per motion filed August 21, 1987, respondents Donald Oren, Wyman D. Nelson, Michael Ruhr, Reynold M. Anderson, Sr. and Reynold M. Anderson, Jr. all moved for summary judgment. The trial court issued an order partially granting summary judgment,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Martinizing International, LLC v. BC Cleaners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Bonfield v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Nordale, Inc. v. Samsco, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.