Legal Opinion

Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1992No. C6-92-400, C8-92-401PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This fraud case involves the purchase of five Harvestore feed storage silos by Raymond and Larry Kronebusch (farmers). The jury returned a verdict in favor of the farmers in the amount of $3,700,000, and the trial court awarded $755,381 in attorney fees pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 325F.67 and 8.31. On appeal from that judgment and an order denying a new trial, A.O. Smith Corporation and A.O. Smith Harve-store Products, Inc. (manufacturers) argue the trial court (1) erred by awarding fees and costs for commercial transactions, and abused its discretion by (2) excluding…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Vikse v. FlabySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Lens Crafters, Inc. v. Vision World, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Peterson v. BASF Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  5. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Third Party v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Third Party Minnesota, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API