Bonfield v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

This is a sequel to the “Opinion” (708 F.Supp. 867 (N.D.Ill.1989) 1 ) issued in this case just four months ago, disposing of all but two of Bonfield’s claims. After issuance of the Opinion, Bonfield filed a two-count First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) asserting:

1. in Count I that omissions by AAM-CO violated the Franchise Act, and

2. in Count II that AAMCO breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing:(a) by omitting to provide material information to Bonfield before he became a franchisee and(b) by unilaterally changing its…