Legal Opinion
Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1948PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor
J. C. Dale, Jr., having been appointed receiver .of the Apex Oil Corporation by the Chancery Court of Davidson County on March 27,1940, thereafter, on July 30,1941, brought this suit to recover certain funds of Apex which he alleged had been wrongfully diverted and misappropriated by the defendants by (1) conspiracy, (2) fraud, and (3) unjust enrichment. The defendants are divided into three groups: (1) Thomas H. Temple Company, Edward Potter, Jr., Justin Potter, Mrs. Bertha Herbert Potter and Thomas H. Temple, referred to as “The Potters’’ or the ‘‘Potter Group. ’’ Mrs. Myra J. Blair and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Zinc Carbonate Co. v. First National Bank of ShullsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Fisher v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Chenault v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- General Edgar G. Doleman, U.S. Army (Retired), Lorrin Dolim, and Robert Rinker v. Meiji Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Japanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.