Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Travelers' Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1911PublishedCited by 62 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of ’Shelby County.— F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The complainant, J. Blaster Fisher, procured of the defendant an accident insurance policy in the sum of $10,-000 on the 5th of November, 1906. This policy contained *463the asnal clauses with respect to accidents producing a partial injury, and also a provision that, in event of death, the principal sum should be paid to his wife, Lula A. Fisher, if surviving; otherwise, to the executors, administrators, or assigns of the insured. This policy is known in the record as “D34802.” Attached to it was what is called a beneficiary supplement, in which the life of the wife was insured against…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Insurance Co. v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  4. Pacific Coast S. S. Co. v. Bancroft-Whitney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Knights of Pythias v. SteeleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mullendore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LambTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hughes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API