Legal Opinion

General Edgar G. Doleman, U.S. Army (Retired), Lorrin Dolim, and Robert Rinker v. Meiji Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Japanese Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1984No. 83-1795PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, minority shareholders of Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Company, seek review of the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) dismissal of portions of their class action for failure to state a cause of action under Hawaii law. Jurisdiction in the federal district court existed by virtue of diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1976). Appellants assert that the dismissed portions of their complaint rested on two valid principles of the law of the State of Hawaii. The first is that minority shareholders can assert a direct cause of action against the purchaser…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bosworth v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. McGlinchy v. Shell Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. McGLINCHY v. SHELL CHEMICAL CO.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Joseph A. Lefebvre v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. Creighton v. City of LivingstonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API