Legal Opinion

Barlage v. Valentine

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 27, 2005No. 2 CA-CV 2004-0127PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this contract action, appellant Dale Barlage contends the trial court erred in vacating the default judgment entered against appellee Leigh Valentine. Because we conclude the basis for the trial court’s ruling was not completely sound, we reverse the order vacating the default judgment and remand the ease for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Appellant Dale Barlage filed this action against Valentine Cosmetics, L.L.C. and Leigh Valentine in June 2003. 1 Barlage attempted to serve the out-of-state defendants in two ways: by mail and publication. Pursuant to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hall v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Blair v. BurgenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Monster Heavy Haulers, LLC v. Goliath Energy Services, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API