Giese v. Karstedt

The issues presented on this appeal are whether the following findings by the trial court are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence:

First, that Frederick Karstedt did not furnish his automobile to his father for regular use prior to and on April 2,1961.

Second, that Frederick Karstedt was not a member of his father’s household on April 2,1961.

According to the policy terms, appellant Iowa National will succeed on this appeal if either question is answered in the affirmative.

Although respondents do not argue this point, it should be noted at the onset that the…