Legal Opinion

National Corn Growers Ass'n v. Baker

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 4, 1986No. 85-08-01151PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RE, Chief Judge:

Defendant-intervenor RAJ Chemicals, Inc., (RAJ) moves for reassignment of this action to a three-judge panel to rehear the decision of a single-judge court. Since the court has concluded that the ultimate resolution of the issues presented in this case can be determined most expeditiously by direct appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the motion is denied.

Background

Plaintiffs, who represent the domestic ethanol industry, on August 29, 1985, commenced this action challenging the Customs Service’s decision to classify certain imported ethanol…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  2. Barnhart v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fundicao Tupy S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  2. Camargo Correa Metais, S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States Customs ServiceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  4. Seattle Marine Fishing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. Roses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API