Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 10, 1983No. Court 81-3-00328PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 255 (1970) and Rule 77(d)(2) and (8), plaintiff moves for the assignment of this action to a three-judge panel. Under Rule 7(c), plaintiff also requests oral argument of its motion pursuant to Rule 56.1 for review of an administrative determination by the Secretary of the Treasury.

19 U.S.C. § 1641(b) provides that a customhouse broker’s license may be suspended or revoked if the Secretary of the Treasury finds that the broker is guilty, inter alia, of “disreputable” conduct. Plaintiff claims that the use of the term “disreputable” as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. HechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Joanna Western Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Erie Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. United States v. Accurate Mould Co., Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Fundicao Tupy S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  4. Vietnam Finewood Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API