Legal Opinion
National Corn Growers Ass'n v. Baker
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 26, 1985No. 85-08-01151PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
AQUILINO, Judge:
Notwithstanding the court’s denial of both plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction and defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in Slip Op. 85-98, as amended, the parties have now returned to this court with renewed requests for the same relief, as well as for other relief.
I
For their part, the defendants (now joined by intervenor-defendant RAJ Chemicals, Inc.) posture that they are immune from this suit, that the court does not have jurisdiction and that the plaintiffs lack standing, to wit:... Despite the pendency of the Federal defendants’…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bomont Industries v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Union Camp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.