Roses, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RE, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff moves before the chief judge for reassignment of these five actions from the assigned judge, and also moves to set aside the orders of dismissal issued by the assigned judge. Since the chief judge concludes that the statutory authority to reassign a case should not be exercised after the assigned judge has rendered a final decision, the motions are denied.
Background
Plaintiff, an association of domestic rose growers, instituted five separate actions challenging various antidumping and countervailing duty determinations by the Department of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chandler v. Judicial Council of the Tenth CircuitSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seattle Marine Fishing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Norwest Bank Indiana, N.A. v. FriedlineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992