Legal Opinion

Roses, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 1, 1988No. Court 84-10-01447, 84-10-01371, 84-08-01215, 84-05-00632 and 84-07-00857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RE, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff moves before the chief judge for reassignment of these five actions from the assigned judge, and also moves to set aside the orders of dismissal issued by the assigned judge. Since the chief judge concludes that the statutory authority to reassign a case should not be exercised after the assigned judge has rendered a final decision, the motions are denied.

Background

Plaintiff, an association of domestic rose growers, instituted five separate actions challenging various antidumping and countervailing duty determinations by the Department of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Chandler v. Judicial Council of the Tenth CircuitSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. In Re International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seattle Marine Fishing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  2. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. Norwest Bank Indiana, N.A. v. FriedlineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API