Legal Opinion

Seattle Marine Fishing Supply Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 22, 1989No. Court 83-10-01552PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RE, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 255(a) (1982), and Rule 77(e)(2) of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade, plaintiffs move before the chief judge for the reassignment of this action, presently assigned to a single judge, to a three-judge panel. Plaintiffs also move for oral argument of this motion under Rule 7(c).

The question presented is whether, pursuant to the authority conferred by statute, the chief judge may reassign this case to a three-judge panel after the judge to whom the case was assigned has rendered a final…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seattle Marine Fishing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Fundicao Tupy S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  4. Roses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sony Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  2. CEMEX, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  3. Aectra Refining and Marketing Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  4. Flint Hills Resources, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API