Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States Customs Service
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUSGRAVE, Judge.
Plaintiffs move for summary judgment to compel defendant United States Customs Service to withdraw a Ruling Letter endorsing the present practice of marking imported frozen produce with country of origin on the rear panel of packages, and to require that such marking be placed on the front panel of packages in type size comparable to the product description and/or in a contrasting color. Plaintiffs also request that Customs be ordered to enact new regulations “to amend 19 C.F.R. § 134.41(b) to enforce the plain Congressional intent of 19 U.S.C. § 1304.” Defendant United…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- American Frozen Food Institute, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- NORCAL/CROSETTI FOODS v. US Customs Serv.United States Court of International Trade · 1992