Legal Opinion
Emanuelson v. Emanuelson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 4, 1992No. 9942PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment in a marital dissolution action. The plaintiff claims that the trial court abused its discretion in making its financial orders and its order that the plaintiff pay the defendant’s counsel fees. We affirm the judgment of the court.
The court found the following facts. The parties were married on July 18,1953. At the time of trial, the plaintiff was sixty-one years old. He is a private attorney who worked as a solo practitioner specializing in estate planning. The defendant, who was fifty-eight years old at trial, did not work outside the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- O'Neill v. O'NeillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Siracusa v. SiracusaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Crowley v. CrowleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Cahn v. CahnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Hornung v. HornungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Bernet v. Bernet, No. 352913 (Sep. 6, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.