Morton v. Adams
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Hebhard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
PRINGLE, C.
Suit to quiet title. Plaintiff is owner of the land. Defendant, London and Lancashire Insurance Company, claims a lien by judgment upon it. The following are the facts; The said defendant recovered a judgment against Emeline Wallace on March 13, 1896. She was then the owner of the land; and the judgment was duly docketed, and became a lien upon it. Emeline Wallace conveyed the land to plaintiff, subject to the lien of the judgment, and died on May 36, 1896. Administration was taken out, and the judgment was presented as a claim against her estate, and the claim allowed on September…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Estate of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Magraw v. McGlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by20 opinions
- Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Kinney v. VallentyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Corporation of America v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.