Legal Opinion

Sharpstein v. Friedlander

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The agreement on which the action was based will be found in the report of the case on the former appeal — 54 Cal. 58.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

When this case was before the late Supreme Court, on a former appeal from a judgment upon demurrer to the complaint in the. action, 54 Cal. 58, the court announced as the law of the case that the plaintiff had the right to elect to regard the two promissory notes which constituted the subject-matter of the agreement upon which the action was founded, as constituting one entire fund, and to take as his share of the fund the unpaid note which liad come into the hands of the defendant, who claimed to hold it as executrix of the estate of Isaac Friedlander, deceased. Defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sharpstein v. FriedlanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Thompson v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Hill v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Carpenter v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Merchants National Bank v. CarmichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API