Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Hart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1913No. 10729PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered January 5, 1912, in favor of the defendants, in consolidated actions to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, and for damages for breach of contract, after a trial on the merits before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The controversy involved in this appeal is between Wiley & Bevington, copartners, building contractors, the German-American Bank of Seattle, their assignee, and the National Surety Company, on the one side, and John B. Hart and wife, the owners of a building under contract for construction by Wiley & Bevington, on the other side. There are involved claims of the contractors against the owners for the balance of the contract price, and a large number of items for extra work and material claimed to have been put into the building by them during its construction at the instance of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Langley v. . RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Cowles v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Crowley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Baltimore Cemetery Co. v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Eggers v. LusterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lindblom v. MayarWashington Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API