Legal Opinion

Eggers v. Luster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1948No. 30669PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover from defendants P. D. Luster and Gertrude Luster, a balance of $9,347.30 claimed to be due for extra work on a building contract, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for the sum due.

In the complaint, it was alleged that shortly prior to April 1, 1946, plaintiffs and defendant P. D. Luster entered into discussions concerning the construction of a building for the defendants; that an estimate was submitted by plaintiffs; that thereafter the parties entered into a contract which provided, among other things, that plaintiffs should construct a building…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wiley v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bjerkeseth v. LysnesWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. American Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Harrington v. McCarthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Keever & Associates, Inc. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API