Lindblom v. Mayar
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chelan county, Grimshaw, J., entered October 11, 1913, dismissing an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, after a trial on the merits to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff commenced this action in the superior court for Chelan county to foreclose a lien claimed by him upon a lot and building thereon belonging to the defendants, as security for a balance due him upon a contract for the construction of the building, entered into by him with the defendants. At the conclusion of the evidence introduced in plaintiff’s behalf, the defendants not having introduced any evidence, the trial court, upon motion by counsel for defendants, dismissed the case, reciting in the final judgment as the reason therefor the following:. . for the reason that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weeks v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Healy v. FallonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Thomas v. . FleuryNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Schmidt v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Summerlin v. Thompson & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Estate of CraneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- Bank of America v. JorjorianAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Haugen v. RaupachWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Matteson v. KlumpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.