Legal Opinion

Crowley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1902No. 4278PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William R. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

On December 6, 1900, respondent entered into a contract with L. T. Parker, under which Parker agreed to furnish all labor and material and construct for respondent three cottages for the sum of $2,145; “first payment, $400, when cottages are roofed in; second payment, $800, wdien first and second coats of plaster are on; third payment, $945, one day after completion and acceptance of buildings ; all payments to be made on receipted bills as payments become due.” The contract provided that respondent might “during the progress'of said buildings…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Bartlett v. StanchfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Badders & Britt v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. McFadden v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. Everett Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Callan v. Empire State Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Brown Bros. v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. Denver Brick & Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API