Legal Opinion

Bisno v. Kahn

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2014No. A133537; A134008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, P. J.

These appeals present the question of whether California’s usury law applies to a judgment creditor’s agreement to forbear collecting on a judgment. In the actions below, certain judgment creditors agreed to delay executing on their judgments in exchange for the payment of forbearance fees in addition to statutory postjudgment interest of 10 percent on the unpaid balance of the judgments. The judgment debtors now claim the forbearance fees are usurious.

We conclude the forbearance fees do not violate California's usury law. Usury liability is wholly a creature of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brice v. Plain Green, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Wishnev v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. Auctus Fund, LLC v. Sunstock, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  4. G Companies Management, LLC v. LREP Arizona LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Schutza v. Walter E. Fiedler Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API