Brice v. Plain Green, LLC.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
DISCUSSION
I. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
The Haynes defendants move to compel arbitration, arguing that I should enforce arbitration agreements that each of the named plaintiffs signed as part of their loan agreements. In addition, to the extent plaintiffs challenge the enforceability of their arbitration agreements, the Haynes defendants argue those challenges should be decided by the arbitrator because the arbitration agreements clearly delegate all disputes concerning the loan agreements to the arbitrator and plaintiffs fail to challenge the delegation provision. Plaintiffs oppose, arguing…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Darlene Gibbs v. Haynes Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Avery v. TEKsystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Blackburn v. A.C. Israel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
- Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Duggan v. MartorelloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.