Legal Opinion
Schutza v. Walter E. Fiedler Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 18, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00257Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No. 18-cv-0257-BAS-LL 12 SCOTT SCHUTZA, 13 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, 14 AND POST-JUDGMENT 15 INTEREST 16 v. WALTER E. FIELDER, INC.; 17 AVIAN AND EXOTIC ANIMAL 18 HOSPITAL, Inc., et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 On August 20, 2019, Plaintiff Scott Schutza requested the Court enter 22 judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68(a). (ECF No. 32.) 23 Defendants had provided Plaintiff with an offer to allow judgment on specified terms, 24 and Plaintiff accepted the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Darnella BARJON and Lee Duran, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Mro Communications, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Now At&t Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.