Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Jack's Auto Sales
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 27, 1999No. AC 17380PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The named defendant, Jack’s Auto Sales, appeals1 from the decision by the workers’ compensation review board (board) applying the law of the case to the workers’ compensation commissioner’s *291award of benefits pursuant to General Statutes § 31-308a.2 The defendant3 also claims that the board improperly held that the plaintiff was entitled to § 31-308a benefits without requiring that he demonstrate that he had been seeking employment. We affirm the decision of the board.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff, Richard Bowman,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. ArenaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Pagano v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Pizzuto v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Paternostro v. Arborio Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Knoblaugh v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.