Legal Opinion
Knoblaugh v. Marshall
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 26, 2001No. AC 20454PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*33 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Pamela Knoblaugh, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner), rendered in a corrected finding and award, dismissing her complaint that the defendant, Daniel Marshall, a physician, terminated her employment in violation of General Statutes § 31-290a,1 which prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for pursuing their rights under the Workers’ Compensation Act, General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the commissioner improperly revisited the issue of liability after having…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gould v. Mellick & SextonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Mele v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- DiBlase v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Cable v. Bic Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Begley v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.