Legal Opinion
Angelos v. State Board of Dental Examiners
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
Plaintiff, a dentist, brought suit to have declared void a regulation, ① promulgated by the Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, which prohibits licensees from advertising certain dental specialties unless the dentist so advertising meets certain standards. Plaintiff had posted a sign reading “Dentistry-Orthodontics.” The trial court summarily struck down the challenged regulation. The Board appeals.
Under its authority to “make and enforce rules * # * for regulating the practice of dentistry * * ORS 679.250 (7), the Board by regulation prohibits Oregon dentists from holding themselves out…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Crouse v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.