Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Workmen's Compensation Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 20, 1976No. 74-317, CA 6079PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board (Board). Petitioner’s employe suffered a compensable aggravation of his preexisting muscular dystrophy condition. Petitioner is subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Law, but did not participate because, as he said, he "never thought about it.” He has therefore been ordered to bear the cost of the employe’s compensation and he has applied for relief from the Second Injury Fund. He now appeals from the Board’s order denying that relief.

The Board order is based upon one of its rules for the administration of the Second Injury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Van Ripper v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Angelos v. State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Harry and David v. Workmen's Compensation Bd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. D & M Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API