Legal Opinion

Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1980No. CA 9772, SC 26120Published

1Opinion of the Court

605 P.2d 273 (1980)

288 Or. 293

Phil MEGDAL, Petitioner,

v.

OREGON STATE BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS, Respondent.

CA 9772; SC 26120.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted October 2, 1979.

Decided January 8, 1980.

John R. Faust, Jr., of Hardy, McEwen, Newman, Faust & Hanna, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. Donald W. McEwen, Portland, on the brief.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen. and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen.

LINDE, Justice.

Petitioner, a dentist licensed both in Oregon and in California…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API