Legal Opinion
Myron v. City of Plymouth
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1997No. C3-96-2078PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s affirmance of respondent city’s denial of his application for a zoning variance and the district court’s grant of summary judgment in the city’s favor on his alternative taking claim. We affirm as to the taking issue, but reverse and remand on the zoning variance issue.
*22FACTS
Appellant is the owner of a corner lot, which is zoned residential. The property, located in respondent City of Plymouth (the City), is currently unbuildable because compliance with the setback requirements in the City’s zoning ordinance would result in a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Summit House Co. v. GershmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Hedlund v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BELVOIR FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. INC. v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Richard Roeser Professional Builder, Inc. v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Graham v. Itasca County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Myron v. City of PlymouthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.