Legal Opinion

Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 2007No. A05-1074PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

Appellant Wensmann Realty, Inc., entered into a purchase agreement with appellant Rahn Family LP for golf course property located in respondent City of Ea-gan. The purchase agreement was contingent on the city amending its comprehensive plan to permit residential development of the property. After the city denied the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, Wensmann and Rahn (collectively, the property owner) commenced an action against the city, alleging that the denial was arbitrary and capricious and constituted a taking of the property without just compensation. On…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API