Legal Opinion
Graham v. Itasca County Planning Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 26, 1999No. C4-99-712PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court affirmed the Itasca County Board of Adjustment’s denial of Dirk Graham’s variance application. Graham appeals, asserting that the denial is arbitrary and capricious and that the governing ordinance violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. By notice of review, the board appeals the district court’s holding that Graham’s appeal was timely. We affirm.
FACTS
The properties involved in this appeal are two adjoining lots located on Bonnie Point of Deer Lake in Itasca County. Dirk Graham purchased the two 100-foot lots from separate…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stanley Haves, Marjorie Haves, His Wife v. City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- In Re BlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Mohler v. City of St. Louis ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Picha v. County of McLeodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Thul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.