Legal Opinion
Summit House Co. v. Gershman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1993No. C2-93-50PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
Appellant seeks review of the district court’s denial of its motion for an order that judgment has been satisfied by a sheriff’s sale of the property and the award of attorney fees to respondents. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1986, respondents Bruce and Karen Gershman (Gershmans) entered into a contract for deed to sell their condominium to appellant Summit House Co., a Minnesota general partnership consisting of Melvin C. Gittleman and Donald W. Anderson (Summit). The contract required Summit to make a balloon payment on October 31, 1987. On September 10, 1987, with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Warren v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Radloff v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Blythe v. KujawaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Kosbau v. DressCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hampton Bank v. River City Yachts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- St. Cloud Police Relief Ass'n v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State Bank of Young America v. FabelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Myron v. City of PlymouthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Metro Motors v. Nissan Motor Corporation In U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.